ABSTRACT
Three antiviral drugs, including interferon alpha (aerosol inhalation), lopinavir/ritonavir (oral medication), and ribavirin (intravenous infusion), are recommended by Diagnosis and Treatment of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (revised version, the 5th ed), which was issued by the National Health Commission of People's Republic of China and National Administration of traditional Chinese Medicine. In addition, clinical trials on a new antiviral drug-remdesivir which is not yet on the market has also been launched in China. Medication safety related data on treatment for infections of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, middle respiratory syndrome coronavirus, human immunodeficiency virus, lopinavir/ritonavir, and ribavirin, safety data of remdesivir in animal experiment, phase I clinical trials and clinical trials of treating Ebola virus infection, and preliminary reports of treatment in novel coronavirus pneumonia were briefly reviewed, aiming to provide evidence for clinical safety medication.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
In December 2019, the endemic of COVID-19 broke out in Wuhan, China. The disease is highly contagious and quickly spreads at home and abroad, causing great concern. However, there are no definite effective antiviral drugs in clinical use. Given the urgency of the COVID-19 outbreak, based on the diagnosis and treatment recommendation and relavant researches, this article describes the optional antiviral drugs such as remdesivir, oseltamivir, arbidol, lopinavir/ritonavir, ribavirin, and interferon-alpha to provide a reference for treatment of COVID-19.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by a novel coronavirus, started in livestock within the markets of Wuhan, China and was consequently spread around the world. The virus has been rapidly spread worldwide due to the outbreak. COVID-19 is the third serious coronavirus outbreak in less than 20 years after Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2003 and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in 2012. The novel virus has a nucleotide identity closer to that of the SARS coronavirus than that of the MERS coronavirus. Since there is still no vaccine, the main ways to improve personal immunity against this disease are prophylactic care and self-resistance including an increased personal hygiene, a healthy lifestyle, an adequate nutritional intake, a sufficient rest, and wearing medical masks and increasing time spent in well ventilated areas. There is a need for novel antivirals that are highly efficient and economical for the management and control of viral infections when vaccines and standard therapies are absent. Herbal medicines and purified natural products have the potential to offer some measure of resistance as the development of novel antiviral drugs continues. In this review, we evaluated 41 articles related to herbal products which seemed to be effective in the prevention or treatment of COVID-19.Copyright © 2021 The Author(s).
ABSTRACT
Objective. To review and summarize literature data in studies of safety of the drug products used for the pathogenetic treatment of COVID-19. Materials and methods. As the first stage of monitoring the drug's safety, which are used in the treatment of COVID-19 in Russia, a systematic review of studies of the drug's safety profiles was carried out: Mefloquine, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, lopinavir/ritonavir, favipiravir, tocilizumab, olokizumab, baricitinib in the international databases Medline, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library for the period 2019-2021. Results. The review included 51 articles that met the selection criteria. Based on the results of the review, it can be concluded that the safety profile (frequency, severity and severity) of most drugs repurposed for COVID-19 corresponds to those for the registered indications. At the same time, according to world experience, there is an increase in the number of reports of adverse drug reactions of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, which is provoked by the active use of these drugs for combination therapy. Conclusions. According to the literature, a high incidence of adverse events was noted in hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine and azithromycin. Subsequent analysis and comparison of the safety profiles of hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine and azithromycin with data from the national automated information system (AIS) database of Roszdravnadzor is a necessary component of effective and safe pharmacotherapy for COVID-19.Copyright © 2021, Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Today, various drugs have been investigated as the primary or complementary treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been used as a mucolytic in pulmonary diseases. This drug apparently contributes to the retrieval of the intracellular antioxidant system. Objective(s): This study aimed to determine the efficacy of NAC in severe COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Method(s): This single-blinded randomized controlled phase III clinical trial included 40 patients with confirmed COVID-19 (based on polymerase chain reaction) admitted to the Shahid Mohammadi Hospital's ICU, Bandar Abbas, Iran, in 2020. All cases had severe COVID-19. They were allocated randomly to two equal groups. Patients in the control group received standard drug therapy based on the treatment protocol of the national COVID-19 committee, while those in the NAC group received a single dose of intravenous NAC (300 mg/kg) upon admission to the ICU in addition to standard drug treatment. Clinical status and laboratory tests were done on admission to the ICU and then 14 days later or at discharge without knowing the patient grouping. Result(s): The two groups were comparable regarding age, gender, and other baseline laboratory and clinical parameters. At the final evaluation, respiratory rate (21.25 +/- 4.67 vs. 27.37 +/- 6.99 /min) and D-dimer (186.37 +/- 410.23 vs. 1339.04 +/- 2183.87 ng/mL) were significantly lower in the NAC group (P = 0.004 and P = 0.030, respectively). Also, a lower percentage of patients in the NAC group had lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) <= 245 U/L (0% vs. 25%, P = 0.047). Although the length of ward and ICU stay was shorter in the NAC group than in controls, the difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.598 and P = 0.629, respectively). Mortality, on the other hand, was 75% in the control group and 50% in the NAC group, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.102). Concerning the change in the study parameters, only the decrease in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was significantly higher with NAC (P = 0.042). The intubation and mechanical ventilation rates were higher, while oxygen with mask and nasal oxygen rates were lower with NAC, but the difference was statistically insignificant. Conclusion(s): Based on the current research, NAC is related to a significant decrease in RR, D-dimer, and DBP in severe COVID-19. Also, LDH was significantly lower in the NAC group than in the controls. More research with larger sample sizes is needed to validate the current study results.Copyright © 2023, Author(s).
ABSTRACT
Objective: To explore the occurrence of adverse reactions of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Method(s): The medical records of patients with COVID-19 who received LPV/r treatment in the Fourth People's Hospital of Nanning from January 24th to February 6th, 2020 were collected and the occurrence of adverse events during the treatment was retrospectively analyzed. According to the 5 principles of adverse drug reaction correlation evaluation proposed in the Handbook of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting and Monitoring in China, adverse events that were certainly related, probably related, and possibly related to LPV/r were defined as LPV/r-related adverse reactions. The incidence of adverse reactions was calculated and the main clinical manifestations and severity of adverse reactions [grade 1 (mild), grade 2 (moderate), grade 3 (severe), grade 4 (life-threatening), and grade 5 (death);grade 3-5 was defined as severe adverse reaction] were analyzed. Result(s): A total of 28 patients were enrolled in the analysis, including 13 males and 15 females, aged from 18 to 70 years with an average age of 44 years. The courses of treatment with LPV/r of patients ranged from 2 to 12 days, with a median course of 6 days. Of the 28 patients, 18 developed LPV/r related adverse reactions, with an incidence of 64.3%. The LPV/r-related adverse reactions in 18 patients included gastrointestinal reactions in 14 patients (grade 1 in 13 patients and grade 2 in 1 patient), bradycardia in 2 patients (grade 2 in both patients), and acute hemolysis in 1 patient (grade 3), and liver injury in 1 patient (grade 3), and no grade 4 or 5 adverse reactions occurred. The incidence of severe adverse reactions was 7.1%. Thirteen patients with grade 1 adverse reactions did not affect the treatment, and the symptoms were relieved after 2-7 days of continuous medication. LPV/r was discontinued in 5 patients with grade 2 or 3 adverse reactions, 4 of whom received symptomatic treatment, and the symptoms disappeared 2-10 days later. Conclusion(s): The incidence of adverse reactions in COVID-19 patients treated with LPV/r in our hospital was 64.3%. LPV/r mainly leads to mild gastrointestinal reactions and can also lead to bradycardia, acute hemolysis, and liver injury. Blood routine, liver function, and electrocardiogram need to be monitored during the treatment.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To study the effect of low-to-moderate dose glucocorticoid therapy on viral clearance in patients with COVID-19. Methods: A total of 72 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from January 19 to February 17, 2020 at the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine were recruited. All patients received oral arbidol and combination of lopinavir/ritonavir or darunavir/cobistitat for antiviral therapy, and symptomatic supportive care. Among them, 51 patients received methylprednisolone (0.75-1.50 mg.kg-1.d-1) (glucocorticoid treatment group), and 21 patients did not use glucocorticoid (control group). The time of virologic negative conversion in sputum and the time of radiologic recovery in lung since onset were compared between the two groups. The Kruskal-Wallis test or Fisher exact test was used to compare the difference between groups. Results: The median ages of the glucocorticoid group and the control group were 52 (45, 62) and 46 (32, 56) years (chi2=4.365, P<0.05). The clinical conditions at hospital admission were different between the two groups (P<0.01). The severe cases accounted for 52.0%, while moderate cases in the control group accounted for 71.4%. The median times from the onset to virologic negative conversion in the two groups were 15 (13, 20) and 14 (12, 20) days (P>0.05). The median times from onset to radiologic recovery were 13 (11, 15) and 13 (12, 17) days in the two groups (P>0.05). In moderate cases, the median times from the onset to virologic conversion in sputum were 13 (11, 18) days in the glucocorticoid group and 13 (12, 15) days in the control group (P>0.05). The median times from onset to radiologic recovery in lung were 12 (10, 15) and 13 (12, 17) days, respectively (P>0.05). Conclusion(s): Low-to-moderate glucocorticoid treatment has no effect on the time of virus clearance in patients with different clinical types of COVID-19, and also no effect on accelerating radiologic recovery in lung, so it is not recommended.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To study the effect of low-to-moderate dose glucocorticoid therapy on viral clearance in patients with COVID-19. Methods: A total of 72 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from January 19 to February 17, 2020 at the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine were recruited. All patients received oral arbidol and combination of lopinavir/ritonavir or darunavir/cobistitat for antiviral therapy, and symptomatic supportive care. Among them, 51 patients received methylprednisolone (0.75-1.50 mg.kg-1.d-1) (glucocorticoid treatment group), and 21 patients did not use glucocorticoid (control group). The time of virologic negative conversion in sputum and the time of radiologic recovery in lung since onset were compared between the two groups. The Kruskal-Wallis test or Fisher exact test was used to compare the difference between groups. Results: The median ages of the glucocorticoid group and the control group were 52 (45, 62) and 46 (32, 56) years (chi2=4.365, P<0.05). The clinical conditions at hospital admission were different between the two groups (P<0.01). The severe cases accounted for 52.0%, while moderate cases in the control group accounted for 71.4%. The median times from the onset to virologic negative conversion in the two groups were 15 (13, 20) and 14 (12, 20) days (P>0.05). The median times from onset to radiologic recovery were 13 (11, 15) and 13 (12, 17) days in the two groups (P>0.05). In moderate cases, the median times from the onset to virologic conversion in sputum were 13 (11, 18) days in the glucocorticoid group and 13 (12, 15) days in the control group (P>0.05). The median times from onset to radiologic recovery in lung were 12 (10, 15) and 13 (12, 17) days, respectively (P>0.05). Conclusion(s): Low-to-moderate glucocorticoid treatment has no effect on the time of virus clearance in patients with different clinical types of COVID-19, and also no effect on accelerating radiologic recovery in lung, so it is not recommended.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ivermectin in patients with mild and moderate COVID-19. Method(s): This study was a single-center, randomized, open-label, controlled trial with a 2-arm parallel-group design on 68 patients with COVID-19. According to the 1:1 ratio between the study groups (ivermectin group and standard treatment group), patients were randomly admitted to each intervention arm. Result(s): The mean age of the participants in the ivermectin group was (48.37+/-13.32) years. Eighteen of them were males (54.5%) and the participants in the control group had a mean age of (46.28+/-14.47) years, with nineteen of them being males (59.4%). As a primary outcome, after 5 days of randomization, there was no significant difference between the ivermectin group and the control group in the length of stay in the hospital (P=0.168). ICU admission (P=0.764), length of stay in ICU (P=0.622), in-hospital mortality (P=0.427), adverse drug reactions, and changes in the mean difference of laboratory data had not any significant difference between the two groups (except for urea change). In addition, the radiologic findings of the two groups of patients were not significantly different. Linear regression analysis showed that for every 10 years increase of age, 0.6 day of hospitalization duration was increased. There was no statistically significant association between other variables and clinical outcomes. Conclusion(s): Among adult hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19, there was no significant relationship between the administration of ivermectin single dose in a five-day course and clinical improvement, and mortality of the participants.Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
2019-nCoV has a up to 96% homology with the gene sequence of a bat coronavirus. By comparing its 7 conserved non-structural proteins, it is found that 2019-nCoV belongs to SARS related coronaviruses(SARSr-CoV). The receptor for 2019-nCoV entering cells is the same as that for SARSr-CoV, and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is a common cross-genus receptor. This article first elaborates the interspecies transmission and genetic variation, then briefly discusses the receptors on the surface of human cells (such as ACE2 and APP4), which cause human infection and encode five proteins in the viral genome, therefore are important targets for development of antiviral drugs. The article reviews eight promising anti-coronavirus drugs, including three anti-HIV drugs (Lopinavir/Ritonavir, Danoprevir/Ritonavir, Darunavir), two anti-Ebola virus drugs (Remdesivir, Galidesivir), two anti-influenza virus drugs (Arbidol, Favipiravir) and one anti-malarial drug (chloroquine phosphate). Among them, Remdesivir, Abidol and Favipiravir have strong inhibitory effects on 2019-nCoV, they may be the most promising drugs under investigation.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
2019-nCoV has a up to 96% homology with the gene sequence of a bat coronavirus. By comparing its 7 conserved non-structural proteins, it is found that 2019-nCoV belongs to SARS related coronaviruses(SARSr-CoV). The receptor for 2019-nCoV entering cells is the same as that for SARSr-CoV, and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is a common cross-genus receptor. This article first elaborates the interspecies transmission and genetic variation, then briefly discusses the receptors on the surface of human cells (such as ACE2 and APP4), which cause human infection and encode five proteins in the viral genome, therefore are important targets for development of antiviral drugs. The article reviews eight promising anti-coronavirus drugs, including three anti-HIV drugs (Lopinavir/Ritonavir, Danoprevir/Ritonavir, Darunavir), two anti-Ebola virus drugs (Remdesivir, Galidesivir), two anti-influenza virus drugs (Arbidol, Favipiravir) and one anti-malarial drug (chloroquine phosphate). Among them, Remdesivir, Abidol and Favipiravir have strong inhibitory effects on 2019-nCoV, they may be the most promising drugs under investigation.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
2019-nCoV has a up to 96% homology with the gene sequence of a bat coronavirus. By comparing its 7 conserved non-structural proteins, it is found that 2019-nCoV belongs to SARS related coronaviruses(SARSr-CoV). The receptor for 2019-nCoV entering cells is the same as that for SARSr-CoV, and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is a common cross-genus receptor. This article first elaborates the interspecies transmission and genetic variation, then briefly discusses the receptors on the surface of human cells (such as ACE2 and APP4), which cause human infection and encode five proteins in the viral genome, therefore are important targets for development of antiviral drugs. The article reviews eight promising anti-coronavirus drugs, including three anti-HIV drugs (Lopinavir/Ritonavir, Danoprevir/Ritonavir, Darunavir), two anti-Ebola virus drugs (Remdesivir, Galidesivir), two anti-influenza virus drugs (Arbidol, Favipiravir) and one anti-malarial drug (chloroquine phosphate). Among them, Remdesivir, Abidol and Favipiravir have strong inhibitory effects on 2019-nCoV, they may be the most promising drugs under investigation.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
Background: Currently, the present world is facing a new deadly challenge from a pandemic disease called COVID-19, which is caused by a coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2. To date, no drug or vaccine can treat COVID-19 completely, but some drugs have been used primarily, and they are in different stages of clinical trials. This review article discussed and compared those drugs which are running ahead in COVID-19 treatments. Method(s): We have explored PUBMED, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE, as well as press releases of WHO, NIH and FDA for articles related to COVID-19 and reviewed them. Result(s): Drugs like favipiravir, remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ivermectin, corticosteroids and interferons have been found effective to some extent, and partially approved by FDA and WHO to treat COVID-19 at different levels. However, some of these drugs have been disapproved later, although clinical trials are going on. In parallel, plasma therapy has been found fruitful to some extent too, and a number of vaccine trials are going on. Conclusion(s): This review article discussed the epidemiologic and mechanistic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2, and how drugs could act on this virus with the comparative discussion on progress and drawbacks of major drugs used till date, which might be beneficial for choosing therapies against COVID-19 in different countries.Copyright © 2022 Bentham Science Publishers.
ABSTRACT
The 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) causes severe pneumonia called COVID-19 and leads to severe acute respiratory syndrome with a high mortality rate. The SARS-CoV-2 virus in the human body leads to jumpstarting immune reactions and multi-organ inflammation, which has poorer outcomes in the presence of predisposing conditions, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, dysglycemia, abnormal adiposity, and even endothelial dysfunction via biomolecular mechanisms. In addition, leucopenia, hypoxemia, and high levels of both cytokines and chemokines in the acute phase of this disease, as well as some abnormalities in chest CT images, were reported in most patients. The spike protein in SARS-CoV-2, the primary cell surface protein, helps the virus anchor and enter the human host cells. Additionally, new mutations have mainly happened for spike protein, which has promoted the infection's transmissibility and severity, which may influence manufactured vaccines' efficacy. The exact mechanisms of the pathogenesis, besides molecular aspects of COVID-19 related to the disease stages, are not well known. The altered molecular functions in the case of immune responses, including T CD4+, CD8+, and NK cells, besides the overactivity in other components and outstanding factors in cytokines like interleukin-2, were involved in severe cases of SARS-CoV-2. Accordingly, it is highly needed to identify the SARS-CoV-2 bio-molecular characteristics to help identify the pathogenesis of COVID-19. This study aimed to investigate the bio-molecular aspects of SARS-CoV-2 infection, focusing on novel SARS-CoV-2 variants and their effects on vaccine efficacy.Copyright © 2022 NRITLD, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Iran.
ABSTRACT
Aim: COVID-19 infection has affected the whole world. It has been speculated that the virus might hold on to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE 2) surfaces of type 2 alveolar cells. ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARBs) are essential antihypertensive and cardiac failure drugs in the guidelines. In this study, we aimed to find the effect of these drugs on clinical, laboratory courses, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients. Material(s) and Method(s): We included 109 patients in this study. There were 43 patients in the ACE/ARB group and 66 patients in the non-ACE/ARB group. The mean age was 60 years in the ACE/ARB group and 52 years old in the non-ACE/ARB group. Basal symptoms, hemogram, CRP, D-dimer, LDH, Ferritin, AST, duration of hospitalization, percentage of intensive care unit (ICU) need, length of stay in ICU were compared between the groups. Result(s): The mean age in the ACE/ARB group was higher than in the other group and was statistically significant (p=.027). The initial symptoms were not different. There were no differences between the laboratory results of the groups. The ICU need was higher in the patients who do not use the drug than in the users (p<.020). Discussion(s): ACE/ARB usage in COVID-19 patients did not worsen the course of the disease. However, ACE/ARB users before COVID-19 pandemic were taken to ICU at a low rate.Copyright © 2022, Derman Medical Publishing. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Liver enzyme abnormalities occur frequently in patients diagnosed with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It has been suggested that patients with severe acute liver injury are more likely to be admitted to intensive care, require intubation or renal replacement therapy and their mortality rate is higher than patients without severe acute liver injury. This review article explores the possible aetiologies of liver dysfunction seen in patients with COVID-19 and also the effect of COVID-19 on patients with pre-existing liver disease. Finally, we suggest clinical approaches to treating a patient with liver enzyme disturbance and COVID-19 and also caring for patients who require liver transplantation in the COVID-19 era.Copyright © 2022 Bentham Science Publishers.
ABSTRACT
Antiviral therapy is important for COVID-19. Currently, the anti-2019-nCoV drugs in clinical trials include broad-spectrum antiviral drugs (alpha interferon and ribavirin), hemagglutinin inhibitors (arbidol), human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors (lopinavir/ritonavir and darunavir/cobicistat), nucleoside analogues (favipiravir and remdesivir) and antimalarial drug (chloroquine);while liver damage may occur in some patients with the medication. This article reviews the research on liver damage associated with anti-2019-nCoV drugs, aiming at promoting the safe and effective antiviral therapy for COVID-19 patients.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
In December 2019, the endemic of COVID-19 broke out in Wuhan, China. The disease is highly contagious and quickly spreads at home and abroad, causing great concern. However, there are no definite effective antiviral drugs in clinical use. Given the urgency of the COVID-19 outbreak, based on the diagnosis and treatment recommendation and relavant researches, this article describes the optional antiviral drugs such as remdesivir, oseltamivir, arbidol, lopinavir/ritonavir, ribavirin, and interferon-alpha to provide a reference for treatment of COVID-19.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.